Description
Waterjet Replacement parts: Adapter HP Water Valve
Item number: 49830904
Details: connected with the valve body, used on the pneumatic valve assembly
Related waterjet replacement parts:
| Item number | Description |
| 20427648 | Valve body |
| 10178697 | Valve seat |
| 49830904 | Adapter, HP water valve |
| 20435636 | Valve stem |
| 10188233 | Backup ring, Brass |
| 20428052 | Seal assembly |
| 10189553 | Actuator assembly, N/O |
| BV401184 | Pneumatic cylinder |
| BV601184 | Cylinder head |
| BV501184 | Piston |
| 10187250 | Backup ring, SST |
| 10074714 | O-ring, 2.44*2.63*.09 |
| 10074565 | O-ring, 2.25*2.38*.06 |
Other waterjet replacement parts:
| Item number | Description |
| 05059712 | HP Cylinder |
| 20417081 | Sealing Head Assembly |
| 20422243 | HP Seal Assembly |
| 10110393 | Seal Assembly |
| 80086622 | Hydraulic Cartridge Seal Assembly |
| 05007786 | Bushing Retainer Flange |
| 05127584 | Proximity Switch |
FAQ of waterjet cutting machine & waterjet replacement parts:
Is water jet cheaper than laser?
The cost of waterjet cutting versus laser cutting depends on a variety of factors, including the material being cut, the thickness of the material, the required tolerances, and the quantity of parts being produced. In general, waterjet cutting is better suited for thicker materials and more complex shapes, while laser cutting is often more cost-effective for thinner materials and simpler shapes.
laser cutting may be more cost-effective for certain materials and applications, as it typically has faster cutting speeds and requires less setup time than waterjet cutting. Laser cutting is also better suited for mass production due to its high-speed cutting capabilities.
Ultimately, the most cost-effective cutting method will depend on the specific project requirements and production volumes. It’s important to consider the full range of costs associated with each cutting method, including equipment costs, operational expenses, and labor costs, when making a decision.
